When deciding whether to buy, sell, or hold a stock, investors often rely on analyst recommendations. Media reports about rating changes by these brokerage-firm-employed (or sell-side) analysts often influence a stock's price, but are they really important?
NEW YORK, June 09, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., a nationally recognized shareholder rights law firm, is investigating potential claims against SoundHound AI, Inc. (NASDAQ:SOUN) on behalf of long-term stockholders following a class action complaint that was filed against SoundHound on March 28, 2025 with a Class Period from May 10, 2024 and March 3, 2025. Our investigation concerns whether the board of directors of SoundHound have breached their fiduciary duties to the company.
The artificial intelligence (AI) sector has been evolving rapidly so far this year and is likely to continue influencing the stock market next year as well, so we had ChatGPT identify 2 AI stocks with the potential to turn a $100 investment into $1,000 by 2026.
Recently, Zacks.com users have been paying close attention to SoundHound AI (SOUN). This makes it worthwhile to examine what the stock has in store.
When spotting a shift in any stock's sentiment, the gauge investors lean on for their ideas usually considers only one side of the equation. That side is who is buying the stock, as far as any big investors or other institutional buyers.
SoundHound AI is a leading independent voice-AI platform, benefiting from the growing ubiquity of voice interfaces across industries and a massive addressable market. Automotive partnerships drive a $1.2 billion backlog, providing strong revenue visibility, while restaurant and IoT upsell opportunities support further growth. Financials show hyper-growth, improving margins, and a solid cash position, with management targeting positive adjusted EBITDA by late 2024 or 2025.
NEW YORK, NY / ACCESS Newswire / May 27, 2025 / If you suffered a loss on your SoundHound AI, Inc. (NASDAQ:SOUN) investment and want to learn about a potential recovery under the federal securities laws, follow the link below for more information: Click Here or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
NEW YORK, May 27, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Attorney Advertising -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized law firm, notifies investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against SoundHound AI, Inc. (“SoundHound” or “the Company”) (NASDAQ: SOUN) and certain of its officers.
NEW YORK, NY / ACCESS Newswire / May 27, 2025 / If you suffered a loss on your SoundHound AI, Inc. (NASDAQ:SOUN) investment and want to learn about a potential recovery under the federal securities laws, follow the link below for more information: Click Here or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
Artificial intelligence (AI) stock SoundHound AI Inc (NASDAQ:SOUN) was last seen up 10% at $10.54, after Piper Sandler initiated coverage with an "overweight" rating and $12 price target.
NEW YORK, NY / ACCESS Newswire / May 27, 2025 / Rosen Law Firm: WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of SoundHound AI, Inc. (NASDAQ:SOUN, SOUNW) between May 10, 2024 and March 3, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important May 27, 2025 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased SoundHound securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
NEW YORK, NY / ACCESS Newswire / May 27, 2025 / Pomerantz LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against SoundHound AI, Inc. ("SoundHound"" or the "Company") (NASDAQ:SOUN) and certain officers. The class action, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and docketed under 25-cv-02915, is on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities other than Defendants that purchased or otherwise acquired SoundHound securities between May 10, 2024 and March 3, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants' violations of the federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain of its top officials.