We’ve got $700k in cash, $1.6 million in brokerage, and $400k in unused land – is 2025 the year to cash out or keep building?
It’s a common dilemma for many folks who’ve inherited a big chunk of land: should one sell it and add to their retirement nest egg, or double down by building something on it to produce another cash flow stream? Indeed, it’s a tough call for many, and while the latter move may be the wisest decision, it doesn’t come without its fair share of risks. Also, someone who’s looking to retire with adult children in college may not wish to take the path that entails heftier near- to intermediate-term expenses. In this piece, we’ll look at a well-off Reddit user in their 50s with plenty of assets and a $400,000 patch of unused land. They’re wondering if they should sell the land or build on it. Whichever route they choose to go, it’s likely to be the wiser move than standing pat with so much wealth tied into an asset that’s not effectively being put to work. Of course, there are opportunity costs that accompany selling off the patch of land, especially if stagflation and recession are in the cards. Key Points This Reddit user is weighing what to do with their big plot of unused land. Building isn’t always the right move, especially given the magnitude of expenses that could be incurred. Are you ahead, or behind on retirement? SmartAsset’s free tool can match you with a financial advisor in minutes to help you answer that today. Each advisor has been carefully vetted, and must act in your best interests. Don’t waste another minute; get started by clicking here here.(Sponsor) What to do with the big patch of land? Turn it into a cash-producing property, sell it off, or leave it as-is? In any case, I think the right move is more a matter of lifestyle than anything else. In addition to costing a fortune (the Reddit user will likely need to borrow a considerable sum), rebuilding a patch of land entails a lot of effort. And for someone who’s looking to wind down for retirement, selling the land may be the more convenient move, especially for those who aren’t comfortable with putting too much of one’s net worth into one asset class: real estate. Though there’s no one-size-fits-all solution, the Reddit user should sit down with a financial planning pro who’s well-versed in real estate projects. Indeed, the inherent costs could easily exceed one’s original budget, especially if one has zero experience with ambitious real estate builds. As such, consulting a pro is a way to better gauge the full extent of the costs and risks one will have to bear by moving ahead with an ambitious project at a time when one should be putting the finishing touches on one’s retirement nest egg. In any case, the big question is whether passive income (rental payments) from the property that one will receive in the future outweighs the hefty bills one will need to put up in the near term. In the interim, perhaps it’s best not to rush a decision. Leaving the land unutilized may be less than ideal, but making a rash, costly decision at a whim seems like the far worse move, at least in my view. In any case, I’d think very carefully about the decision and hire the right folks (specifically, advisors and builders) to give you a better gauge of final costs so that you can better gauge the risks prior to signing the dotted line. There are simpler, more efficient ways to bet on real estate. There are easier ways to bet on real estate that doesn’t entail going into debt, selling off a portion of one’s investments, and taking on costly projects. If the Reddit user can sell their land at or around market value ($400,000 or so), they can use the proceeds to bet on a diversified portfolio of real estate investment trusts (REITs), which, I view as a more efficient, liquid, and less intensive way to bet on real estate. Why put it all on one investment property when one can bet on a broader basket of real estate projects at a low cost? The Vanguard Real Estate ETF (NYSEARCA:VNQ) boasts a mere 0.13% expense ratio and allows investors to bet on close to 150 names across a wide range of real estate sectors. Indeed, it’s not just residential where there’s rental income to be made! Still down around 20% from its 2021 highs, the VNQ stands out as a fantastic pick-up while it’s yielding 3.66%. For a retiree who’s looking for less stress and more efficiency, selling the land and using the proceeds to invest in such an ETF makes a lot of sense, in my opinion. The post We’ve got $700k in cash, $1.6 million in brokerage, and $400k in unused land – is 2025 the year to cash out or keep building? appeared first on 24/7 Wall St..
Sell VNQ And Buy These 2 Quality REITs
VNQ is highly diversified across various REIT sectors, but includes some underperforming segments and poorly managed REITs. The current macroeconomic outlook is very favorable for quality REITs. I present two of my favorite REIT picks to BUY.
3 Sector ETFs & Stocks to Gain Despite Downbeat February Jobs Data
These sectors added decent jobs in February when the U.S. economy added fewer-than-expected jobs.
Want Decades of Passive Income? Buy This ETF and Hold It Forever.
There are some excellent opportunities in the stock market for long-term investors right now, and that's especially true in the world of dividend stocks.
3 Vanguard ETFs to Buy With $1,000 and Hold Forever
Vanguard ETF are some of the most popular exchange-traded funds among investors, and for good reasons. Not only are there Vanguard ETFs that allow you to invest in virtually any stock market index, sector, or category of stocks, fixed-income, or commodities you want, but Vanguard funds give everyday investors a cost-effective way to do it.
VNQ: Oh, How The Tables Have Turned In 2025
Index funds, particularly VNQ, offer a simple, cost-efficient way to invest in the real estate sector, including both favored and unfavored REITs. VNQ's market capitalization-weighted approach provides exposure to growing REITs, but results in relatively stagnant distributions due to sector rotation. Sector rotation impacts VNQ's performance, with industrial REITs rebounding and data centers lagging, highlighting the benefits of an indexed approach.
VNQ: REIT Discussion Reveals A Small Position Is All You Need In A Diversified Portfolio
The Ivy Portfolio allocates 20% each to domestic stocks, international stocks, intermediate bonds, commodities, and REITs, mimicking Harvard and Yale endowments. REITs offer high returns, low correlation with stocks, and psychological benefits, but they crash with markets and are tax inefficient. Most people already have significant real estate exposure, making additional REIT investments risky; a small allocation in a diversified portfolio is ideal.
Baby Boomers: The Only Vanguard ETFs You Need for Passive Income and Growth in Retirement
Founded by investing legend John Bogle, “the father of index investing”, Vanguard has become the second largest asset manager in the financial industry after BlackRock.
Investing $50,000 in These 3 High-Yield Vanguard ETFs Can Generate Nearly $2,000 of Passive Income Every Year
Investing $50,000 in These 3 High-Yield Vanguard ETFs Can Generate Nearly $2,000 of Passive Income Every Year
Here's My Top Vanguard Dividend Stock ETF to Buy in 2025
There are some excellent exchange-traded funds (ETFs) for dividend investors, and there's a solid case to be made for some high-dividend ETFs, dividend growth ETFs, and other types. But when it comes to my top dividend ETF to buy in 2025 as a long-term investment, the Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ 0.34%) is the clear winner for me.
Commercial real estate won't be as distressed as last year, says RXR CEO Scott Rechler
Scott Rechler, RXR chairman and CEO, joins 'Squawk on the Street' to discuss where things stand in the commercial real estate industry.
1 No-Brainer High Dividend Index Fund to Buy Right Now for Less Than $100
After a tremendous performance in 2021 as the world gradually normalized from the COVID-19 pandemic, the real estate sector has been a major laggard in the years since.
