The Supreme Court just ruled on our closed-end funds (CEFs).
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund currently offers a high dividend yield of approximately 15.7%. BRW's per-share value has declined annually from $9.86 in 2021 to $8.07 in 2024, with a slight rebound projected for 2025. The fund's monthly distribution stands at $0.085 per share, raising questions about long-term dividend sustainability.
Boaz Weinstein is a name many CEF investors know. He's an activist investor who's targeted CEFs in the past, particularly those he sees as underperforming.
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund now trades at a -13% discount to NAV, its widest since Saba took over in 2021. BRW's post-rights-offering performance has been sharply negative, with a -15% drawdown despite benign market conditions. Key portfolio drags include a large position in Ethereum Classic (down -54%) and Bumble (down -55%) since October 2025.
BRW: Unjustified Valuation But Rate Cuts Could Improve Performance
Both BRW and SABA offer hedge fund-like strategies in a closed-end fund format, providing diversification and no performance fees. BRW currently offers a higher distribution yield (13.01%) and trades at a 6.56% discount to NAV, while SABA yields 7.70% at an 8.69% discount. Portfolio allocations have shifted, with both funds reducing SPAC exposure and holding large short positions in sovereign debt, emphasizing active management.
I sold my stake in BRW to double down on SABA, which offers a more compelling 9.72% discount despite a lower distribution rate. BRW, managed by Saba Capital, has a unique portfolio and a narrowing discount, but its 12.4% distribution rate seems unsustainable long-term. SABA and BRW are very similar, with over 50% of AUM in the same securities; SABA's wider discount makes it more attractive.
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund offers high current income through a diverse portfolio, including crypto and private investments, but suffers from NAV decay. Despite a 13% dividend yield, BRW's earnings fail to support payouts, leading to a consistent decline in NAV and poor performance. The fund's heavy exposure to below-investment-grade debt and interest rate sensitivity pose significant risks, especially in a high-rate environment.
The closed-end fund space saw a significant narrowing of discounts throughout 2024 as equity markets charged higher and now discounts remain tight heading into 2025. In particular, equity CEFs have seen significantly narrowed discounts along with taxable fixed-income, though municipal bond funds look relatively attractive after widening discounts in December. We are screening for funds with the deepest discounts and widest z-scores to find potential buys and funds that may be getting a bit pricey as sell candidates.
The Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund offers a unique income strategy by investing in alternative assets and privately held investment companies, providing high diversification and a 12.90% yield. The fund has outperformed both the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and the S&P 500 Index, appreciating by 11.10% in five months. The fund employs leverage to boost returns but maintains a conservative leverage ratio of 14.99%, reducing risk compared to peers with higher leverage.
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund aims to generate income and total returns by investing through various credit-based hedge fund strategies. BRW's manager also runs activist campaigns to reduce discounts to net asset values of other CEFs. This helps to achieve better returns on closed-end funds but also suggests exemplary ethics in terms of stewardship.
We take a look at the trio of Saba's public investment funds. CEFS is a pure-play fund of CEFs, while the CEFs BRW and SABA have allocations to a diverse array of securities, including reinsurance, loans, stocks, SPACs, crypto, etc. SABA will likely transition over time to be similar to BRW - it remains our favored option between the two funds.