LM
Lacey Manz Portfolio
Invests via Rovida Investment Management Ltd. | Managed by Lacey Manz
Invests via Rovida Investment Management Ltd.
Managed by Lacey Manz
Automatically Tracked
Operating investor focused on growth-stage technology and fintech. Lacey Manz brings experience as a founder and operator and serves as an active board member, allocating capital across SaaS, fintech and marketplace companies. Known for sourcing cross-border deals, scaling go-to-market strategies and preparing companies for exits; works with institutional LPs on fund formation and secondary transactions. Current activity centers on direct investments and advisory roles to founders.
Operating investor focused on growth-stage technology and fintech. Lacey Manz brings experience as a founder and operator and serves as an active board member, allocating capital across SaaS, fintech and marketplace companies. Known for sourcing cross-border deals, scaling go-to-market strategies and preparing companies for exits; works with institutional LPs on fund formation and secondary transactions. Current activity centers on direct investments and advisory roles to founders.
Investment Philosophy & Strategy
Disclaimer: This Portfolio is derived from and computed based on publicly available data from SEC filings.
Gain and growth charts are calculated per selected timeframe:
104.36%
Gain -1.24%
Monthly
3.64%
Yearly
53.58%
Drawdown
35.85%
$1.33B
Equity
Holdings
$1.33B
Investment
$965.81M
$377.5M
Profit -$9.36M
Realized
$16.95M
Unrealized
$360.55M
Dividends
$8.28M
Goals
Avg. 30% completed goals
Yearly
Gain > 5% 2026
Yearly
Gain < 20% 2026
Today
Compared To Yesterday
Gain
-1.24%
Profit
-$9.36M
Win %
48%
This Week
Compared To Last Week
Gain
-0.7%
Profit
-$9.36M
Win %
48%
This Month
Compared to last month
Gain
3.88%
Profit
$49.52M
Win %
48%
This Year
Compared to last year
Gain
-7.94%
Profit
-$114.29M
Win %
48%
KTOS Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
+6.75%
+$6.21M 
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation
+3.44%
+$2.76M 
FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
+3.1%
+$1.82M 
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
+0.7%
+$170,200.46 
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF
+0.47%
+$60,000 
ASPI ASP Isotopes Inc.
0%
$0 
BA Boeing Company
0%
$0 
BEKE Ke Holdings Inc. ADR
0%
$0 
HTHT H World Group Limited American Depositary Receipt
0%
$0 
IBKR Interactive Brokers Group Inc.
0%
$0 
NOK Nokia Corporation Sponsored ADR
0%
$0 
V Visa Inc. Class A
0%
$0 
NBIS Nebius Group N.V.
0%
$0 
GLXY Galaxy Digital Inc. Class A Common Stock
-13.1%
-$4.96M 
BLSH Bullish Inc.
-8.45%
-$402,000 
AMTM Amentum Holdings, Inc.
-8.04%
-$611,100 
GOOGL Alphabet Inc
-4.03%
-$9M 
BILI Bilibili Inc.
-2.21%
-$42,000 
NTB The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited
-1.32%
-$1.47M 
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited SP ADR
-0.36%
-$37,600.8 Events
Loading...
Dividends
Dividend Analysis
Loading...
No Data
| Trades 66 | Longs Won 36/66 54% | Profit Factor 7.56 |
| Profitability | Shorts Won 0/0 0% | Standard Deviation $27.07M |
| Average Win $12.08M | Best Trade (Aug 06) $234.49M | Sharpe Ratio -12.87 |
| Average Loss -$1.92M | Worst Trade (Sep 01) -$10.47M | Z-Score -0.56 (42.26%) |
| Commissions $0 | Avg. Trade Length 9m 1w 2d | Expectancy $5.72M |
| Loss Size | 100% | 90% | 80% | 70% | 60% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 10% |
| Probability of Loss | <0.01% | <0.01% | <0.01% | <0.01% | <0.01% | <0.01% | <0.01% | 0.07% | 1.03% | 11.54% |
| Consecutive Losing Trades | 692 | 623 | 554 | 484 | 415 | 346 | 277 | 208 | 138 | 69 |
Hover over the desired column for a detailed explanation.
Returns
Overall, Monthly| Symbol | Quantity | Cost | Value | Comm. | Profit ($) | Gain (%) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMTM Amentum Holdings, Inc. | 315,000 | $8.21M | $6.99M | - | -$1.22M | -14.81% | -8.036% |
| ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF | 375,000 | $11.21M | $12.94M | - | $1.73M | 15.47% | +0.466% |
| ASPI ASP Isotopes Inc. | 4.1M | $29.57M | $17.59M | - | -$11.98M | -40.52% | 0.0 |
| BA Boeing Company | 832,000 | $158.72M | $197.32M | - | $38.59M | 24.31% | 0.0 |
| BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited SP ADR | 80,000 | $12.37M | $10.28M | - | -$2.08M | -16.86% | -0.364% |
| BEKE Ke Holdings Inc. ADR | 900,000 | $15.48M | $15.43M | - | -$57,500 | -0.37% | 0.0 |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | 100,000 | $1.7M | $1.86M | - | $155,000 | 9.11% | -2.212% |
| BLSH Bullish Inc. | 200,000 | $12.72M | $4.36M | - | -$8.36M | -65.74% | -8.445% |
| FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | 870,000 | $51.14M | $60.37M | - | $9.23M | 18.05% | +3.105% |
| GLXY Galaxy Digital Inc. Class A Common Stock | 1.71M | $41.31M | $32.92M | - | -$8.39M | -20.3% | -13.098% |
| GOOGL Alphabet Inc | 591,000 | $211.02M | $214.2M | - | $3.17M | 1.5% | -4.03% |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 23,000 | $23.25M | $24.39M | - | $1.14M | 4.88% | +0.703% |
| HTHT H World Group Limited American Depositary Receipt | 200,000 | $10.06M | $8.46M | - | -$1.6M | -15.87% | 0.0 |
| IBKR Interactive Brokers Group Inc. | 300,000 | $13.24M | $26.59M | - | $13.35M | 100.84% | 0.0 |
| KTOS Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. | 1.77M | $46.79M | $98.21M | - | $51.42M | 109.89% | +6.748% |
| NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 2M | $160.39M | $450.61M | - | $290.22M | 180.94% | 0.0 |
| NOK Nokia Corporation Sponsored ADR | 350,000 | $4.64M | $3.47M | - | -$1.17M | -25.19% | 0.0 |
| NTB The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited | 1.79M | $67.45M | $109.92M | - | $42.47M | 62.96% | -1.32% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 378,898 | $70.69M | $83.06M | - | $12.37M | 17.5% | +3.435% |
| V Visa Inc. Class A | 50,000 | $15.84M | $18.48M | - | $2.64M | 16.68% | 0.0 |
No Data
Option values are updated at end of day.
No Data
No Data
Option values are updated at end of day.
No Data
No Data
No Data
No Data
FAQ
Which stocks have generated the highest profits for Lacey Manz?
The largest contributions to the portfolio's profits come from the following stocks: Nebius Group N.V - $10.37M, The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited - $6.53M, Uber Technologies, Inc - $4.44M, Dada Nexus Ltd - $4.02M, and iShares Russell 2000 ETF - $2.12M. These positions have been the main drivers of growth and have significantly impacted the investor's overall performance.
Which stocks have generated the largest losses for this investor?
The largest losses in the portfolio are associated with the following stocks: Alphabet Inc - $2.75M, Borr Drilling Ltd - $2.2M, Bullish Inc - $1.65M, Amazon.com Inc - $1.58M, and Galaxy Digital Inc. Class A Common Stock - $318,000. These positions have had the most negative impact on overall performance and highlight the weaker areas of the portfolio.
What dividends does Lacey Manz's portfolio generate?
The portfolio generates substantial dividend income, with a total of $8.28M earned over time. The largest contributors to dividend income include The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited - $5.95M, H World Group Limited American Depositary Receipt - $705,000, Freeport-McMoRan Inc - $261,000, iShares Russell 2000 ETF - $229,972.5, and Ke Holdings Inc. ADR - $198,000. This indicates that dividends play a meaningful role in the investor's overall strategy.
How stable are Lacey Manz's monthly returns?
Lacey Manz's monthly returns look highly volatile. The portfolio shows large month-to-month swings, and the broader risk profile suggests that performance can change sharply over short periods. This kind of pattern may suit users who are comfortable with significant fluctuations, but it is less likely to appeal to those who prefer steadier and more predictable results.
Can Lacey Manz's strategy be considered aggressive or moderate?
Lacey Manz's strategy can be considered aggressive. The combination of high drawdowns, elevated volatility, and/or concentrated positions suggests a willingness to accept significant risk in pursuit of higher long-term returns. This approach is generally more suitable for users who are comfortable with large fluctuations in portfolio value.
Should beginners follow Lacey Manz's strategy?
Lacey Manz's strategy is unlikely to be suitable for beginners. The portfolio shows signs of high risk, significant volatility, or structural complexity, which can make it difficult to follow and potentially stressful for less experienced users. This type of approach is generally better suited to more advanced investors.
